Friday, July 12, 2013

Everything I Can (Think of to) Say About Layering Cardigans

OK, let's talk more about layering cardigans. Egad, I love this type of garment. When you live in Toronto, you have the unique opportunity to put on and take off a sweater a minimum 32 times a day: walk to work (sweater off), get to work (sweater on), super hot meeting room (sweater off), freezing restaurant (sweater on). You get the idea. The fact is that slim sweaters span the gap between seasons. They fancy up a sleeveless garment. Seriously, add a scarf and you're the chicest thing that ever happened, 30 seconds flat. They look good with a t shirt or a placket-blouse or a slim turtleneck or nothing.

But the thing is, they have to fit.

I know, I know, you're thinking: Lord, that woman went away for 2 weeks and now she's back - still spouting the same rhetoric - as fast as you can utter the words "proper measurements". What can I say? You don't read this blog for the novelty.

So, just to harp on things, when I say these garments have to fit, this is what I mean:
  • The shoulder seam must lie over your own shoulder tip.
  • The arms should be fitted, but not sausage-tight.
  • The V (if there's a V) should fall at a point that works to visual advantage.
  • The length - oh, this is a toughie - should fall at the slenderest point on your own lower torso. That's different for all of us but it means that, if you're short-waisted, you need a cardigan cut for a short-waist - not one cut for a long-waisted person that you buy in a smaller size than your usual.
  • By this account, the closure placket must lie directly over the midpoint of your torso - not sliding or pulling - regardless of whether the cardigan is open or closed. That means you can't really cheat by buying a sweater for a wide and long person when really what you need is room in the boobs.
  • The cardigan should skim your own torso closely but not tightly. Hint: If it's cut straight in the waist (aka, there's no indent where your own waist would be), move on.
Furthermore, because you're buying something that's already made - and that huge variable has been removed from the equation - there's really no excuse for poor fit. If it fails to meet the dictates above, just say no.

I must have tried on 8000 slim cardigans in the last 2 weeks. 90 per cent of them did not flatter my small-shouldered, short-waisted, voluptuously-busted shape. Can't say it did much for my ego.

But I ended up with these, and I'm very pleased:

 1. Ca Va De Soi black cardigan in viscose and Elite:

Photographing dark neutral colours (especially black) is a total bitch! I did the best I could to give you a sense of the colour saturation in this shot...

Here I wanted to show the cool - extremely resilient - waffle textile. Of course, the arms on this dress-form are quite a bit wider than mine so they, unfortunately, distort the fit in the arm and shoulder. You have to trust me when I say it fits on my body.
2. Theory Jilma Evian Cardigan in navy merino (with a bit of synthetic to promote fabric recovery):

See how this skims the waist? And the V is low enough to draw the eye to one's assets without giving away too much...

My fave feature of this is the cool stripe (part of the knit, not an overlay) on the sleeves. It's just a bit exciting.
Some other things I also want to mention:
  • By the time you've tried on 8000 sweaters that don't fit, you're kind of compelled to lose your sticker-shock. It's either spend or walk and these things, well-fitted, don't grow on trees. Remember, they're not closet-garments. You will wear and cart a sweater of this variety all over the world. I'm always amazed when people balk at spending on pricey basics. By parallel example, I wear my jeans 3-5 times per week. I want them to wear well and to last long so I will spend as much on them as on the pair of dress pants I wear twice a month. I'd actually be happy to spend less on the dress pants - if only I could! (That's what making pants is for...)
  • On this topic, Ca Va de Soi does not believe in discounting its (undoubtedly fine) product. A bit of info about the company: It was a wholesale operation till a few years ago. (Note to Anon from yesterday: I now remember that I used to buy the pieces from Ewanika on Bathurst just south of Dupont.) Occasionally, I'd find a mark down when a) a lone sweater remained (rare) or b) the style was discontinued but now that the family-run company markets and sells for itself (in addition to wholesaling product to other boutiques), it works with a very specific bias: The stuff is top of the line and it will sell. All items are continuity (with rare exceptions). Any chance of sale you have will be with a third-party seller.
  • The fit of this brand is narrow in the shoulders and generally small in the bust. Relatively few of the styles work on me because they end up being too boxy in the waist and too snug in the boobs. Fit in the shoulders often disqualifies me for fit in the chest, but when it works (which is often enough), it's a good scene. There are MANY options to choose from but this brand caters to a slender frame most of the time. The sweater above is actually quite different than most others because the viscose knit is extremely giving (it does snap back). The Large in this style could fit a generous RTW size 14 well, I suspect. I bought the small and I have been known to wear a large in this brand, just to give some perspective.
  • The fabrics are fucking awesome. Honestly, amongst the best I've ever felt. The company works with Italian and Egyptian mills. The designs are au courant, elegant and ageless. 
  • The price reflects the quality. You'll spend between $200 - $300, before tax, on one of these sweaters. Occasionally more. I choose to think of it like buying a suit jacket - but one that will get much more wear because it's bound to fit better (and be more comfortable and more resilient and more flexibly applied to numerous different styles of outfit).
  • You'd think there would be one freakin' photo of either of these sweaters available on the freakin' internet. Apparently not. I realize that warhorse garments don't tend to bristle with excitement, but I've seen so many equally boring versions of the layering cardigan all over the place. I mean, Ca Va de Soi I can understand (sort of). They're all about not needing your business. But Theory?!
  • The Theory sweater is currently available, on sale, at Holt Renfrew. Don't quote me but I think it was $200 including tax.
  • It's particularly malleable because of the 3/4 sleeve and the almost-cropped length. It comes in a cotton as well as in a merino. I don't recommend the cotton. It stretches and it doesn't snap back. The cotton-version colours are also less saturated. While it doesn't look it, the navy of this sweater is very rich.
  • I am only liking the Theory cardigan more, as I own and wear it. You know I'm all about the navy. Sure, sometimes black is right, but more often, a navy sweater does the trick. The merino is not thick - so it can be worn over most summer dresses - but it will nicely segue through all seasons.
So there you go. Two sweaters, 5000 words :-)

Which do you prefer?

21 comments:

  1. "you have the unique opportunity to put on and take off a sweater a minimum 32 times a day" - love it. As a UK resident, there are about three days a year when one feels sufficiently confident in the sunshine to be without a cardigan adn umbrella.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yeah - I forgot to mention the umbrella! It's not as bad here from a rain perspective (but as the weather patterns change, it's getting there).

      Delete
  2. I like Theory more ) Don't know why.
    BTW, once I get cashmere Theory cardi for $95 on YOOX, so may be worth a try to look there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oooh, that's great. I don't know that YOOX delivers to Canada (gonna check). I seem to recall that, when first I looked on the site, there wasn't shipping here. Maybe I'm misremembering...

      Delete
    2. It ships to Canada, and I really like sale prices )), I've got some really cool stuff there which otherwise would cost me a fortune. But I have to confess it really fuels shopoholism )

      Delete
  3. Couldn't agree more with you about the value of a good cardigan, although the rhythm of wearing one varies with our more temperate West Coast climate. I had a Ca va de Soi cardi years ago -- a silk blend, I vaguely remember, in black. Classic. Perfect. Why did I ever let it go? Must have worn it out, I suspect. . . .Enjoy yours, and thanks for the analysis! You are so thorough. . . ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was hoping you would comment! I think that this brand is very elegant but can be worn so well casually. So of course it reminded me of you :-) Get another!

      Delete
  4. Since you asked. I like the 5000 words .. Lol....

    I like both sweaters - slim cut design.. . I'm not sure about the waffle weave but then the only waffle weave I've tried have on acrylic sweater which went back on display.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's like a sickness :-) The waffle weave is weird, I agree, but in a fun way. It doesn't look cheap in the way that textile often can... In acrylic, I can imagine it would have been a sauna!

      Delete
  5. I love this post. I have never less than 4-5 cardigans - all cashmere - they are a staple of my workwear. I have it on my "to do" list to knit a cardigan (not necessarily cashmere). . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Pam! I love the cashmere cardi also, but the fit (given the textile) is different than that of my go-to layering cardigans. Of course, I love both kinds of garment and you can't beat cashmere for the hand! As you know, I've knit a bunch of cardigans (which I love), but you just can't get the skinny for layering that RTW provides. Mind you, knit that cardi! You'll love and wear it all the time...

      Delete
  6. P.S. I buy all mine normally from Saks Off Fifth (the Saks Fifth Avenue outlet) or Nordstrom (on Sale). . .and they are pricey 100 - 250. But I wear them extensively - and all grandfather style (for the most part) . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oooh, good choices! Thanks for the info. I do think there are many ways to benefit from the online sales. This is one of them.

      Delete
  7. I feel like I should take a trip to T.O, go shopping with you and let you dress me as I stand there like a Barbie doll. Being 23, poor, and a 28FF means that a shitty fit is inevitable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do not despair! You'll only be 23 and poor for as long as those tits stay perky regardless of fit :-) There are some good, not-so-pricey alternatives. I'm not the best for advertising those because I'm not in that headspace right now. But online sales can save your ass. Just make sure everything's returnable.

      Delete
  8. I love layering cardigans - one good thing about New Zealand is the prevalence of (relatively) cheap merino. I buy at least one new merino cardigan each year, and completely wear them out!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oooh, that is a good feature about NZ! So many sheep, so little time :-)

      Delete
  9. For me, the garment that I'll be wearing my cardigan with also factors into determining the correct length. If I'm wearing a full skirt, I prefer a cardigan no longer than the high hip but if I'm wearing a pair of trousers, I prefer a slightly longer length. I feel like either of these two lengths can work well with a pencil skirt -- it depends on the pencil skirt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're so right! I do think that diff lengths are key (and different closures - snaps or zips can be easier to wear). But if we can't find them all (or afford them!), one length sometimes has to work for diff outfits. It's not optimal though, I agree.

      Delete
  10. Yes! My preferences do tend to live in a hypothetical cardigan world with unlimited funds rather than in reality!

    ReplyDelete